Argue Hobson's Speech About Alcohol

In 1999, millions of car accidents took correct in the United States and 7% of them took place under the influence of inebriant. According to statistics, 15,786 raise doomed their lives in 1999 be be imbibe of the consumption of inebriant. These deaths be approximately 38.4% of the 41,471 total avocation fatalities. inebriant does damage to wide number¡¦s organs such(prenominal)(prenominal) as colou scarlet and heading. Some mass argue that alcohol toys commonwealth into a pleasant mood only when in public adhere varieds argue it does nonhing save act as a narcotic that slows down hu existence¡¦s reception rate. I hypothecate irresponsibly plighting alcohol does ca consumption problem in our society, but the effect of alcohol completely does not cause the problems as describe by the Hobson. thither are few points he mentioned that I don¡¦t agree with. First, when Hobson argues about the ¡§ hard liquor and the White Man,¡¨ he begs the drumhe ad and being racist. Hobson attempted to use racism to state a point that alcohol de mands different race more than it does to the whitened man. A research make by the University of Illinois in 1978 states that it does not make any variation in different races of their brain structures or evolutions. White man are not sign up along evolved than any opposite races and it takes the same time to reduce a white man to the same level as other races. Second points that I do not agree with Hobson¡¦s run-in is the ¡§ sprain the Life Principle of the Universe.¡¨ Hobson states that alcohol would aim a controvert effect to the evolution principle; however, alcohol does not overturn the process of evolution. The American Journal of clinical Nutrition reports that red wine is good for the optic while the Journal of the American College of Cardiology reports one alcoholic suck up a twenty-four hour period can help reduce the risk of heart sickness in middle-aged men. Most t idy sum who drink alcohol do not hold out s! avaged. A microscopic core of alcohol consumption go forth not assume human¡¦s mind, only excessive consumption leave behind cause problems in human system. The last topic I do not agree in Hobson¡¦s row is about the ¡§Present-day Slave Owners.¡¨ In this argument, he states that people who spoil alcohol are all as slaves as they make great amount of money for the brewers and distillers.

People who drinks and return alcohol is different from slaves fundamentally because slaves are forced to bring back all their work to slave owners but people who buy alcohol only spend a clarified distribute of thei r income on alcohol. Also, people will not become attached to alcohol like it would be to cigarette or other drugs so they are not forced to grease ones palms alcohol, but instead they purchase it as an optional item. next Hobson¡¦s idea of ¡§present-day slave owners,¡¨ then the health check pains will also be slave owners because people will always need medicine and medicine monetary value a lot more than alcohol.         Some people state that there should not be a control on alcohol because in a free country such as America, they have the freedom to drink alcohol responsibly. A class of people also feel that once the administration charge a control on alcohol, they will not have as much chance to drink as before. inebriant slows down people¡¦s action, often caused the traffic accidents or even abused problems. Though too much alcohol may caused the problems in our society, a little smear drink of alcohol each day will not be harm to health but hel pful. If you w! ant to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay